by J. D. Heyes
Ever wonder if most parents, if offered truthful evidence regarding the potential dangers of vaccines, would permit their children to be vaccinated? The fact is, if moms and dads were to ever be presented with a truthful consent form, most would never take the chance and subject their kids to vaccine dangers.
Imagine being given information regarding vaccination that pointed out that with “timely treatment” there is no need to fear the “infectious diseases” that vaccines are supposed to stave off.
Or that a child may get the very diseases the vaccines were supposed to prevent anyway.
Or – and this is a big one – vaccines actually contain known toxins.
Would a sane parent still make the choice to endanger their child?
As noted by the website VacTruth.com, a truthful consent form might look something like this:
Long-running study reveals findings that the medical community won’t reveal
As VacTruth goes on to note, there is a duty and responsibility for getting informed consent from parents, and it falls upon each provider of the vaccine. “It is a personal duty and responsibility,” the site notes, “which may not be delegated to another with impunity.”
Indeed, those are the closing words of the first tenet of the Nuremberg Code – informed consent. But informed consent regarding vaccine truth these days is sorely missing; the mainstream medical establishment, it seems, has already decided that “the science is settled,” and therefore, vaccine “deniers” are simply to be dismissed as one would the lunatic fringe.
Only, too many parents know that vaccines are not safe – and they, sadly, have the evidence to prove it in vaccine-injured children.
Yet the risk continues because the mainstream medical community can’t or won’t embrace their responsibility.
“Egregiously, the administering doctor or nurse – or CVS pharmacist – in no way meaningfully fulfills his obligation by providing incomplete information, printed on a form he may or may not even offer, all the while touting the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine,” states VacTruth.
“More fundamentally, the medical industry in no way fulfills its obligation when it omits from medical school curricula any meaningful education in the reality, nature or extent of vaccine injury, or the essential, fundamentally curative role of the disease recovery process.”
The evidence is mounting, however, and soon, the truth won’t be so easy to hide.
In January 2013, Food Matters noted that one report cited an ongoing study in Germany that compares disease rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated kids; it indicates pretty clearly the disparity between the two groups regarding illness rates:
As reported by the group Health Freedom Alliance, children who have been vaccinated according to official government schedules are up to five times more likely to contract a preventable disease than children who developed their own immune systems naturally without vaccines.
Time for more truth in modern medicine
Initially released as its own preliminary study in September 2011, the survey includes data on 8,000 children who were not vaccinated and whose overall disease rates were compared to disease rates among people in the general population, most of whom had been vaccinated.
In every single disease category, the survey data indicated that unvaccinated kids fared far better than vaccinated children in terms of both disease prevalence and severity. Translated, that means that evidence suggests that vaccines are neither effective nor safe.
“No study of health outcomes of vaccinated people versus unvaccinated has ever been conducted in the U.S. by CDC or any other agency in the 50 years or more of an accelerating schedule of vaccinations (now over 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before kindergarten, 26 doses in the first year),” wrote Louis Rain back in 2011 for Health Freedom Alliance, regarding the survey.
Truth is the best weapon when it comes to the dangers of vaccines. Perhaps someday modern medicine will advance enough to employ it.
Source: Natural News